Agreement Between France, The Federal Republic Of Germany, Japan, The United States Of America, Denmark, Finland, Norway And Sweden Concerning A Joint Project For Planning, Design, Experiment Preparation, Performance And Reporting Of Reactor Safety Experiments Concerning Containment Response
Source: United States Treaties and Other International Agreements, vol. 28, pp. 629 (TIAS 8479).
AGREEMENT
between
COMMISSARIAT A L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE, FRANCE
(hereinafter called "CEA")
ELECTRICITE DE FRANCE, FRANCE
(hereinafter called "EdF")
GESELLSCHAFT FÜR KERNENERGIEVERWERTUNG IN SCHIFFBAU UND SCHIFFAHRT MBH, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
(hereinafter called "GKSS)
JAPAN ATOMIC ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE, JAPAN
(hereinafter called "JAERI")
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, USA
(Former UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION hereinafter called "AEC") and
ATOMENERGIKOMMISSIONEN, DENMARK
(hereinafter called "AED")
MINISTRY OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY, FINLAND
(hereinafter called "MTI")
INSTITUTT FOR ATOMENERGI, NORWAY
(hereinafter called "AEN") and
AKTIEBOLAGET ATOMENERGI, SWEDEN
(hereinafter called "AES")
hereinafter jointly called "the contracting parties"
concerning
A JOINT PROJECT FOR PLANNING, DESIGN, EXPERIMENT PREPARATION, PERFORMANCE AND REPORTING OF REACTOR SAFETY EXPERIMENTS CONCERNING CONTAINMENT RESPONSE (hereinafter called "the project").
I PREAMBLE
Considering
-the decisive influence of the safety aspects on nuclear power
-the generally acknowledged need for large scale experimental safety studies well suited for international collaboration
-the possibilities offered by the Marviken reactor for such large scale experiments, already demonstrated in an international project concerning full scale containment tests performed during 1972 and 1973
The contracting parties have this day agreed as follows:
II PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT
The purpose of this Agreement is to establish cooperation between the contracting parties in a project using jointly the Marviken reactor for certain safety experiments. The project covered by this Agreement comprises a joint programme for planning, design, experiment preparation, performance and reporting of reactor safety experiments concerning containment response.
III SCOPE OF THE PROJECT
The scope of the project is to prepare and perform containment response tests at Marviken within the framework of an international cooperation.
The project will be performed according to Appendices A-F and will aim at providing the contracting parties with further information mainly on certain dynamic phenomena in connection with containment blowdown situations.
The framework of the project is laid down in the appendices to this Agreement:
Appendix A Description of programmes
Appendix B Instrumentation
Appendix C Organization
Appendix D Budget
Appendix E Time schedule
Appendix F Reports
The project consists of three kinds of activities:
a) planning and design
b) experiment preparation and performance of the test programme and
c) data reduction and reporting of data and interpretation of results
The description in Appendix A reflects the fact that a certain minimum number of tests is necessary for the programme to be meaningful. It is consequently agreed that a minimum of 8 blowdown tests (blowdowns Nos 17 - 24) within the programme to be specified in accordance with Appendix A shall be performed.
The time schedule contains reserve time which partly is intended for repetition of experiments if needed.
IV ORGANIZATION OF THE PROJECT
1. The project shall be directed by a project board. The board shall decide on all matters concerning the project within the framework of this Agreement.
Each contracting party shall appoint one member
of the board. The member appointed by AES will be the chairman of the board. Each member of the board may be assisted at the board meeting by one specialist who shall not have a voting right. The board shall meet at least 3 times a year. Additional board meetings shall be convened at the request of one member of the board.
The decisions of the project board shall normally be made by mutual agreement. Should it be necessary to vote on any decision, each member of the board shall have a number of votes in proportion to the financial commitment of the contracting party concerned according to Article VI below. Every member shall be given the opportunity to cast his vote. 60 % of the votes cast are required for a decision. An opportunity will be provided for voting in absentia and/or through designated alternate upon proper and timely notification of the matter to be voted on. Should it be necessary to revise the programme, the board should be prepared to meet at short notice.
The distribution of votes among the four Nordic countries will be stated at the first board meeting.
AES has an absolute veto right against decisions involving the safety of the plant or conflicts with Swedish laws and regulations.
2. AES shall appoint a project manager. The appointment requires the approval of the project board. The project manager shall be responsible to the project board for the execution and management of the agreed project. His duties include the drawing up of detailed programmes of work, including cost and time schedules.
The project manager shall be present at the meetings of the project board and shall have the right to participate in the deliberations He shall report at each meeting on the progress of the work of the project.
3. A committee, called the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), shall be established. The committee shall be composed of senior technical experts. Each contracting party having a share of 20 % of the total budget shall have the right to designate two members and each contracting party having a share of less than 20 % shall have the right to designate one member. The committee has the authority to direct the project manager on technical matters within the scope, cost and time schedule of the programme. Differences in opinion between the TAC members shall be resolved by the vote following the same procedure as applies to the voting in the board. If the project manager considers a proposal from the TAC to lead to an increase in costs or to a prolongation of the time schedule, the matter shall immediately be brought by him to the attention of the board for decision. Pending the decision of the board, no action shall be taken by the project manager that may infringe upon the freedom of the board to decide. The project manager shall be in attendance at the meetings of the committee.
The chairman of the project board chairs the meeting of the TAC. The committee shall meet at least three times per year. The meetings shall be convened by the chairman of the project board on his own initiative or at the request of members representing at least 40 % of the votes of the committee.
4. In the performance of his duties, the project manger shall be assisted by a project staff as exemplified in Appendix C.
5. AES undertakes to render the necessary technical and administrative services and to procure the material for implementation of the project. Legal acts relating to the carrying out of the project shall be performed by AES on behalf of the contracting parties.
6. For the financial management of the project, AES shall arrange an adequate book-keeping and reporting system according to the needs of this Agreement. Additional reporting that may be required for specific national reasons is not the responsibility of the project. The auditing shall be performed by the auditors of AES, and if so requested by any of the other parties, by auditors elected by them.
V TIME SCHEDULE
1. The starting date of the project is February 1, 1975 and the project shall he carried out in accordance with the time schedule in Appendix E.
2. As no development work on instrumentation or other equipment is planned within the project it is vitally important that the board makes it their responsibility to supervise that only well proven and tested instrumentation and other equipment is used for the experiments. At the end of the preparation phase the board shall review the situation regarding the installed instrumentation and other equipment and its formal approval is required for the start of the experimental phase.
3. At least after every second blowdown the TAC shall decide whether the blowdown and measurement conditions have concurred with the general descriptions of the experiments in the agreement and whether the information achieved is complete enough to be useful or if the experiments should be repeated. This decision shall be communicated to the board members immediately
VI BUDGET AND FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS
1. Expenditure relating to the carrying out of the project shall be borne by the contracting parties under the conditions specified in the present Article.
The project budget as presented in Appendix D amounts to Skr 13.7 millions. This amount includes all foreseen wage and price increases for the programme planned to be carried out and specified in Appendix A - F.
As a reserve to cover possible additional expenses caused during the project in excess of the budget, the parties undertake jointly to make available an amount of Skr 0.5 million. The parties also undertake jointly to make available an amount of Skr 0.3 million in excess of the budget as a reserve to cover unforeseen inflationary cost increases during the project. The utilization of these reserves requires specific decisions by the project board. Including the reserves the total budget is Skr 14.5 millions.
The project costs and the relevant reserve stated in this Article are calculated on the basis of a current station availability during the period indicated in the time schedule in Appendix E. Cost increase due to interrupted availability of the Marviken plant shall he borne by the AES, provided that the interruptions are not caused by the performance of the experiments.
The contracting parties undertake to contribute to the financing of the total budget as follows:
[TAB]%.[TAB]Skr
millions
GKSS[TAB]20[TAB]2.9
CFA[TAB]10[TAB]1.45
EdF[TAB]10[TAB]1.45
JAERI[TAB]20[TAB]2.9
AEC[TAB]20[TAB]2.9
AED
MTI
AEN
AES[TAB]20[TAB]2.9
[TAB]100[TAB]14.5
3. The project shall be debited with the cost of the personnel of the project staff supplied by the contracting parties under the conditions specified in Article VII and in Appendix D, where all personnel costs are given according to nominal AES wage codes, inclusive of statutory social dues multiplied by 1.75. When project personnel are working outside their home organizations, the project shall be debited with an additional per diem cost according to AES's rules. Costs for travels to and from the permanent residence of the personnel are paid by the respective home organization.
For services rendered by the parties upon order from the project using personnel not classified as project personnel and for material provided, the party shall be reimbursed for its costs. Thus neither profit nor gain shall be included except in case of commercial products already on the market.
4. When paying their financial contributions according to this Article VI the parties shall be entitled to deduct the costs for wages and per diem of project personnel according to Article VI:3.
5. Within six weeks after the end of each quarter of a year, the project manager shall present accounts for the project to the parties in summarized figures as to the costs incurred during the preceding quarter, and shall at the same time give a cost estimate for the current quarter.
The total actual cost for the project shall he accounted for within three months after the termination of the project.
6. Payments of contributions shall be made to AES and made available to the project in quarterly instalments on the basis of cost estimates and accounts as outlined under this Article VI:5, and quarterly reports.
The first advance payment shall be due within four weeks after the signing of this Agreement by all the parties and shall cover all the costs accounted for in the budget incurred up to the date of signature as well as the costs calculated for the rest of the current quarter. The subsequent advance payments are due within two weeks upon receipt of the quarterly cost accounts/costs estimated.
VII SUPPLY OF PERSONNEL
1. During the project, the contracting parties shall, within the total budget, contribute to the project staff by supplying project personnel, along the lines specified in Appendix C: p 4.
The project staff shall be appointed and seconded to the project by the contracting parties with the agreement of the project manager. The project manager shall be responsible for the duly qualified composition and efficiency of the project staff and shall have the right to take the appropriate measures to that effect. The project personnel will remain in the employment of their respective employers. The project staff, during their participation in the project, work under the authority of the project manager and shall be subject to the general working rules of AES such as ordinary working hours, vacation periods etc.
2. The parties shall, if considered necessary by the board, maintain at the disposal of the project their project personnel for a period not exceeding the period stated in Appendix E by more than three months. Such prolongation shall fall within the total budget and be credited according to the same rules as set out in Article VI:3.
3. In addition, each party may at their own expense and under their own responsibility participate with delegated personnel to the extent agreed by the project manager. They may use their own equipment if agreed by the project manager. Such personnel when working in the project are subject to the rules stated in this Article VII:1.
VIII INFORMATION AND USE OF RESULTS, INCLUSIVE OF INVENTIONS
1. The results of the project shall be presented in the form of appropriate progress and final reports as specified in Appendix F.
2. All information derived from the execution of the project shall be made available to the contracting parties.
3. Prior to approval by the parties for publication, the information will be freely available to government authorities, organizations and companies in the participating countries for their own use but not for publication by discretion of the respective parties. When required by administrative procedure in its country, each party may on its own responsibility disseminate or otherwise make use of information from the experiments.
The project will not bear any responsibility for such information as is not approved by the project board and which is not contained in the project reports as specified in this Article VIII:1. In such cases the party should carefully consider the possible necessity of due reservations regarding the validity of the information with respect to the final total evaluation of the project results. During the period covered by the Agreement the parties may not without the consent of the project board supply information on project progress and resluts to organizations and companies outside the contracting Nordic countries, the Federal Republic of Germany, the United States, France and Japan.
4. Prior to the termination of the project, the project board must decide upon such results that may not be published.
5. Patentable or not patentable inventions made in the course of the project work shall be made available to the project; the party responsible for any such invention undertakes to give the right of use to the project, free of cost charge.
6. Patentable inventions made in the course of the project work shall be considered made by the inventor as member of his home organization and patent matters shall be settled by the respective party according to the laws and regulations in the respective country, provided, however, if a party decides to file patent applications for an invention in one or several countries, the other parties shall be granted non-exclusive royalty-free licences to use the invention in such countries, including the right to grant sublicences to organizations and companies of their own country.
7. Each party waives any and all claims against the other parties for compensation, royalty or award, as regards any inventions or discoveries, made in the course of, or under this Agreement and releases the other parties with respect to any and all such claims, including any claim under the provisions of the applicable employer-employee invention legislation of the participating countries.
8. When one party has previously been granted or has applied for patents on an invention which could have significance for carrying out the project, the right of use of this invention shall be granted the project free of cost charge by the respective party.
IX LIABILITY
1. AES undertakes to maintain during the whole project period the following insurance protection.
-Insurance of the equipment procured for the experimental work against fire, explosion, water pipe damage and/or damage to machinery, amounting to a total coverage of Skr 8 million.
- Insurance of the data records against loss through fire, theft, and transport accidents, amounting to a coverage of Skr 1 million.
-Liability insurance covering personal injury and damage to property which befall the project personnel or third parties and for which a party to this Agreement or its personnel is responsible according to the applicable general rules. This insurance shall amount to a total coverage of Skr 3 million for personal injury and a total coverage of Skr 1 million for damage to property.
2. The cost for the above insurances shall be paid by the project as a part of the project cost.
3. The non-Swedish parties shall not be liable for any indemnification in excess of the amounts stated above. In case of excess AES shall be liable for any indemnification whatsoever.
4. This Agreement shall not limit any right to compensation on the basis of the general rules which are applicable in each case for the indemnification of personal injury or damage to property.
X ACCEPTANCE OF FURTHER PARTICIPANTS
If other entities wish to join the project, the project board shall examine the economic and other conditions of such participation and prepare a recommendation thereon for the contracting parties. Acceptance of further participants requires unanimous agreement by the contracting parties.
XI UNFORESEEN OCCURRENCES AND RIGHT TO WITHDRAW
1. Should unforeseen occurrences put in doubt the achievement of the project objectives within the agreed time, budget or cost schedule, the project manager shall immediately report to the project board, which shall decide on the continuation. A decision to continue shall require the unanimous agreement of the parties, and must include necessary amendments of the time, budget or cost schedule as the case may be.
2. If a decision to continue the project can not be reached, then any party to this Agreement shall have the right to withdraw from the Agreement. In such a case the withdrawing party is under an obligation to fulfil its share of project commitments which originate prior to the date of the withdrawal. The withdrawing party has the right to all information produced by the project up to the date of withdrawal. The information will be supplied in the form existing at the date of withdrawal without processing of the data.
XII ARRANGEMENTS FOR TERMINATION OF THE PROJECT
Equipment purchased within the project budget is regarded as being the property of the parties, each having a share in the percentage proportion to the financial contribution as given in Article VI:2.
After the termination of the project such equipment which can still be utilized for other purposes will be evaluated under consideration of normal depreciation. AES will make up a list of such equipment and its value for approval by the project board.
If AES with the approval of the project board decides to retain such equipment, the other parties will be credited in proportion to their financial grants.
The project board shall decide upon the disposal of such remaining equipment as is not retained by AES.
When selling equipment after the termination of the experiments, the costs for dismantling of such equipment and associated restoration shall be paid from the income of the sale of such equipment. The estimated economic net result shall be approved by the board before any action is taken in such matters.
In case of a decision to terminate the project prior to its fulfilment, under the circumstances described in Article XI, AES undertakes to cancel the remaining delivery contracts and other remaining commitments for the project as soon as possible.
XIII COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES
The parties warrant that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees or bona fide established commercial or selling agencies maintained by the parties for the purpose of securing business. In case of any breach or violation of this warranty, the parties shall have the right to annul this contract without liability or at their discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee.
XIV OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT
No member of or delegate to the U S Congress, or resident commissioner, shall be admitted to any share or part of this contract, or to any benefit that may arise therefrom; but this provision shall not be construed to extend to this contract if made with a corporation for its general benefit.
XV DISPUTES
Any disputes between the parties involving other than AEC, concerning the application or interpretation of this Agreement, that are not satisfactorily settled through consultation, shall be submitted to Swedish court or, if so requested by one of the parties concerned, be referred for final settlement by arbitration in Stockholm according to the Swedish Act on arbitrators. With regard to any such dispute to which AEC is a party that are not satisfactorily settled through consultation, such disputes shall be decided by a court rather than by arbitration.
This Agreement has been signed in nine copies, one for each party.
[ED: Signatures omitted]
1975 For COMMISSARIAT A L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE FRANCE 1975 For ELECTRICITE DE FRANCE FRANCE 1975 For GESELLSCHAFT FÜR KERNENERGIEVERWERTUNG IN SCHIFFBATUND SCHIFFAHRT MBH FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY For JAPAN ATOMIC ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE JAPAN 1975 For UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (FORMER UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION) USA For ATOMENERGIKOMMISSIONEN DENMARK 1975 For THE MINISTRY OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY FINLAND 1975 For INSTITUTT FOR ATOMENERGI NORWAY For AKTIEBOLAGET ATOMENERGI SWEDEN
APPENDIX A
DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAMMES
1 GENERAL
The experiments described below include the studies of containment response (subchapter 2.1) and the studies of impact loads in the wetwell under accidental conditions (subchapter 2.2).
The containment response tests are mainly related to studies of pressure oscillations in the containment and measurements of the parameters thought to be important for the understanding of these phenomena. The test proposal contains eight experiments.
The instrumentation and data acquisition systems for these experiments are outlined in Appendix B. It should be emphasized that for some of the listed measurements the measurement technique has not yet been definitely defined. It is agreed that a satisfactory technical solution of the instrumentation problems shall be presented and that the expected outcome and applicability of the results shall be specially considered before these measurements are finally incorporated in the experimental program.
2 OBJECTIVES
2.1 Containment response tests (CRT)
The main objectives of the CRT are to generate relevant data and provide a qualitative interpretation of them. The test results will provide more detailed information on phenomena, observed in the MX-I series of test. More specifically, the experiments aim at providing knowledge about the influence of the following factors on pressure oscillations in the containment.
- Total vent pipe area
-Submergence depth (varying pool level)
-Pool surface area (reducing by inserting internal structures)
-Pool mass (varying pool level and pool surface area)
-Vent flow path geometry
-Pool temperature (due to heating during blowdown)
-Vent mass flow rate
-Mixture composition in vents (fraction of air)
2.2 Supplementary tests
A supplementary test which will be performed in conjunction with the CRT programme is the measurements of impact loads on structures in and above the pool. The purpose is to get an idea about the order of magnitude of these loads in order to verify theoretical models.
3 DESCRIPTION OF THE BLOWDOWN SERIES
The participants have agreed on a series of blowdowns as at present planned and indicated in Table 1.
The table shows the main parameters for eight tests being supplementary to the previous series of 16 tests (The Marviken I Project).
The preliminary programme is reflecting the ideas at the time of the signing of the agreement. It should not be regarded as a fixed programme but may have to be modified as a result of theoretical studies before the start of the experiments as well as of experience gained during the experimental period. The decisions on these matters rest with the Project Board. Individual tests may have to be repeated if necessary to provide adequate information.
Reasons for the choice of test parameters in the proposed blowdown series:
Blowdown 17
This is a close simulation of Blowdown 10 in the earlier series which had indicated significant pressure oscillations. The test should reproduce those conditions and thereby provide a data base for instrumentation check-out.
Blowdown 18
This is similar to Slowdown 17 but with a reduced vent flow area. The purpose is to get an increased vent mass flux. The blocking of the vent pipes should be arranged so as to provide a simple symmetrical and compact pattern. The arrangements will be compatible with the new pool geometry in Slowdown 21.
Blowdown 19
This test will utilize prepurging of the drywell air in order to investigate the influence on oscillations of noncondensibles in the vent flow.
Blowdown 20
This test will be run with a reduced submergence depth associated with a reduced pool water mass. A significant change of submergence depth is wanted and for geometrical reasons can only be obtained by reducing the pool water volume. The lower temperature indicated at the start of the prepurging is meant to compensate for the decreased pool mass.
Blowdown 21
This test will be carried out with the pool volume reduced to about three quarter of the normal volume. The reduction will be achieved by introducing an internal structure forming a new pool around the unblocked vent pipes and thus reducing the pool cross section. The smaller pool mass will result in an increased temperature rise. The reduced pool mass may also have an effect on the pressure oscillations.
Blowdown 22
This test should show the effect of air on pressure oscillations as compared to Blowdown 21. The dynamic loads on the structures above the pool can be compared to the results from Blowdowns 17 and 18.
Blowdowns 23 and 24
These tests intended to show effects on the pressure oscillations due to changes in vent system geometry. The specific changes should be determined on the basis of further theoretical studies.
Supplementary remarks to Table 1
INITIAL VESSEL PRESSURE
The pressure at the start of the blowdown (after the prepurging) should be close to 50 bar. It is assumed that no air pressurization is used.
INITIAL VESSEL WATER LEVEL
The choice of water level will primarily be governed by the desired blowdown times. The initial water contents are estimated to vary from 200 to 300 tons.
LOCATION OF RUPTURE
Pipe rupture will be simulated on the steam line and possibly on the feed water line. Arrangements for prepurging via the top pipe will be made.
RUPTURE ARRANGEMENT
The simulation of the large break on the steam line needs a rupture disc arrangement, possibly with a plunger and an air cushion. The simulations of the smaller breaks will need only valves.
BREAK AREAS
The steam line will have a maximum possible break area equivalent to an orifice of 350 mm diameter. The aim is to achieve flow rates in the range of 1500-2000 kg/sec.
The feed water line break will correspond to a 150 mm diameter giving flow races of the order of 300 kg/sec.
The flow through the top pipe will be arranged for mass flow rates up to 200 kg/sec.
INITIAL POOL TEMPERATURE
The initial pool temperature in Table 1 is considered to be the temperature at the time of the start of the rupture, i.e. after the prepurging when prepurging is carried out. The exact value of the actual temperature is not considered to be important, but may not vary by more than ± 100C from the temperature indicated in table 1.
SPRAY COOLING
At present there seems no reason for spray cooling during the test.
TEST TERMINATION
The blowdowns are to be terminated by closing valves in the break pipes at predetermined times.
TABLE 1
Test[TAB]Kind[TAB]Room[TAB]Flowrate
4)[TAB]Vessel
3)[TAB]Pool T. [TAB]Subm[TAB]Vent area[TAB]Pre-purging[TAB]Remarks
17[TAB]Water[TAB]122[TAB]1500 kg/s[TAB]50 bar[TAB]20°C[TAB]2.8 m[TAB]~4 m2[TAB]No[TAB]Reference test to MX-I, Blowdown 10.
18[TAB]Water[TAB]122[TAB]1500 kg/s[TAB]50 bar[TAB]20°C[TAB]2.8 m[TAB]~2 m2 1)[TAB]No[TAB]
19[TAB]Water[TAB]122[TAB]1500 kg/s[TAB]50 bar[TAB]20°C[TAB]2.8 m[TAB]~2m2[TAB]Yes2)[TAB]
20[TAB]Water[TAB]122[TAB]1500 kg/s[TAB]50 bar[TAB]20°C[TAB]0.5 m[TAB]~2m2[TAB]Yes2)5)[TAB]Possibly with perpurging depending on results of No19, with 10°C in pool reaching 20°C before large
break.
21[TAB]Nacer[TAB]122[TAB]1500 kg/s[TAB]SO bar[TAB]20°C[TAB]2.8 m[TAB]~2m2[TAB]Yes2)5)[TAB]With new pool geometry. Barrel around the active vent pipes.
22[TAB]Water[TAB]122[TAB]1500 kg/s[TAB]50 bar[TAB]20°C[TAB]2.8 m[TAB]~2m2[TAB]No[TAB]Apart from no purging, as test No 21.
23[TAB]Water[TAB]122[TAB]1500 kg/s[TAB]50 bar[TAB]20°C[TAB]2.8 m[TAB]~2m2[TAB]Yes2)5)[TAB]As test No 21 with geometry changes in vent system. "Detuning".
24[TAB]Water[TAB]122[TAB]1500 kg/s[TAB]50 bar[TAB]20°C[TAB]2.8 m[TAB]2m2[TAB]Yes2)5)[TAB]As test No 23, with geometry changes in vent system. "Detuning".
1) About half the number of the vent pipes to be blocked, leaving a compact roughly circular pattern.
2.) Purging with water break in room 124. Estimated purging flow c 200 kg/sec. (To be higher than drywell condensation rate, according to previous experiments). Possibly supplemented with flow to lower drywell. Flowpaths for effective purging and possible changes should be investigated.
3.) The question of whether to use air of pressurization of vessel is to be investigated further.
4.) The possibility to arrange for changes of flow race during blowdown is to be investigated further.
5.) The decision concerning prepurging may have to be revised in light of the results of Blowdown 19.
BLOWDOWN TIMES
Blowdown times will be determined on the basis of the various parameters values from the tests already performed. The times are expected to be in the range of 100-1000 sec.
PREPURGING
Whether prepurging should be performed in the upper drywell only or in both the upper and the lower drywell should be looked into.
APPENDIX B
INSTRUMENTATION
1. Semi-Static Measurements
1.1 List of data channels for digital recording
Running
No.[TAB]Measurement
Position[TAB]Parameter[TAB]Number of Channels[TAB]Range[TAB]Accuracy[TAB]Remarks
1.1.1[TAB]Pressure vessel[TAB]Temperature
Pressure[TAB]10
3[TAB]0-270˚C
0-60 bar[TAB]+/- 2˚C
+/-0,5bar[TAB]-
1.1.2[TAB]Main Steam line[TAB]Temperature
Pressure
Mass flow rate
Steam quality[TAB]2
2
1
1[TAB]0-270˚C
0-60 bar
0-4000 kg/sec
-0,4 to1,0[TAB]+/- 2˚C
+/- 0,5bar
+/- 10%
+/- 1%[TAB]Measurement technique not yet identified
1.1.3[TAB]Top pipe[TAB]Temperature
Pressure
Mass flow rote
Steam quality[TAB]2
2
1
I[TAB]0 - 270˚C
0 - (debar
0 - 500kg/sec
-0,4 to 1,0[TAB]+/- 2˚C
+/- 0,5bar
+/- 10%
+/- 1%[TAB]See 1.1.2
Running No.[TAB]Measurement
Position[TAB]Parameter[TAB]Number of Channels[TAB]Range[TAB]Accuracy[TAB]Remarks
1.1.4[TAB]Feed water line[TAB]Temperature
Pressure
Mass flow rate
Steam quality[TAB]2
2
1
1[TAB]0-270˚C
0-60bar
0-1000 kg/sec
-0,4 to1,0[TAB]+/- 2˚C
+/-0,5bar
+/- 10%
+/- 1%[TAB]See 1.1.2
1.1.5[TAB]Drywell[TAB]Temperature
Pressure
Differential
Pressure[TAB]20
10
2[TAB]0-200˚C
0-4bar
0-lbar[TAB]+/- 2˚C
+/- 1,5%
+/- 2,5%[TAB]
1.1.6[TAB]Vent pipes[TAB]Temperature[TAB]20[TAB]0-150°C[TAB]+/- 2°C[TAB]
1.1.7[TAB]Wetwell[TAB]Temperature
Pressure[TAB]100
3[TAB]0-150°C
0-4bar[TAB]+/- 2°C
+/- 1,5%[TAB]_
1. 1.8[TAB]Spray system[TAB]Temperature
Mass flow rate[TAB]2
3 [TAB]0-150°C
0-100kg/sec[TAB][TAB]Only for operational purpose.
▲P=measurement
1.1.9[TAB]Drywell-Wetwell[TAB]Differential
pressure[TAB]2[TAB]0-1 bar[TAB]+/- 2.5%[TAB]
1. Semi Static Measurements
1.2 Costs for additional equipment and manpower
Running
No.[TAB]Measurement[TAB]Additional
Equipment[TAB]Developments
and preoptests[TAB]Hardware
Costs
(Skkr)
1.2.1[TAB]Temperature[TAB]~30 Thermocouples
2 Reference units
3 Reference thermometers
Calibration equipment
Installation materiel
~30 DC-amplifier[TAB]Not necessary[TAB]98.0
1.2.2[TAB]Pressure[TAB]~4 Pressure gauges
4 DC-amplifiers
Calibration equipment
Installation materiel[TAB]Not necessary[TAB]51.0
1.2.3[TAB]Differential
pressure[TAB]~4 ▲p-cells
2 DC-amplifiers
Installation materiel[TAB]Hysteresis
Long time accuracy
Dynamic behaviour
of ▲p-cells[TAB]28.0
1.2.4[TAB]Mass flow rate[TAB]~3 Barton cells
~2 ▲p-cells
Installation material[TAB]Dynamic behaviour
of Barton cells[TAB]23.0
1.2.5[TAB]Steam quality[TAB]Equipment not yet
fixed[TAB]Measurement
technique[TAB]~20.0
Running
No.[TAB]Measurement[TAB]Additional
Equipment[TAB]Developments
and preoptests[TAB]Hardware
Costs
(Skkr)[TAB]Manpower
(manyear)
1.2.6[TAB]Data acquisition
system
(256 channels)[TAB]some devices for repair[TAB]Not necessary[TAB]25.0[TAB]
[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]245.0 Skkr[TAB]1,2 Eng.Instr.
0,5 Eng. Prog.
1,3 Mechan.
2. Dynamic Measurements
2.1 List of data channels for analog or PCN-recording
Running
No.[TAB]Measurement
Position[TAB]Parameter[TAB]Number
of
Channels[TAB]Range[TAB]Accuracy[TAB]Remarks
2.1.1[TAB]Main steam line[TAB]Temperature
Pressure
Mass flow rate
Steam quality[TAB]1
1
1
1[TAB]0- 270°C
0-60bar[TAB]+/- 2°C
+/- 0,5bar[TAB]Thermocouple with outer diameter </=0,5mm
0,1- 100 Hz
2.1.2[TAB]Drywell and
Header[TAB]Temperature
Pressure
▲p-cells[TAB]15
15
4[TAB]0-150°C
0-4bar
0-1bar[TAB]+/- 2°C
+/- 1.5%
+/-2.5%[TAB]Thermocouple with outer diameter </= 0,5mm
0,1-100 Hz
0,1 -50 Hz
2.1.3[TAB]Vent pipes[TAB]Temperature
Pressure[TAB]6 (2x3)
6 (2x3)[TAB]0-150°C
0-4bar[TAB]+/-2°C
+/-1,5%[TAB]Thermocouple with outer diameter
< 0,5mm
0,1-100 Hz
2.1.4[TAB]Wetwell[TAB]Pressure[TAB]6[TAB]0-4bar[TAB]+/-1,5%[TAB]0,1-100 Hz
2. Dynamic Measurements
2.2 Costs for Hardware and Manpower
Running
No.[TAB]Measurement[TAB]Equipment[TAB]Developments
and preoptests[TAB]Hardware
Costs
(Skkr)[TAB]Manpower
manyear
2.2.1[TAB]Temperature[TAB]22 Thermocouples
22 DC-amplifier
calibration equipment
Installation material[TAB]Time constant of the thermocouples[TAB]62.0[TAB]0,2 Eng. Instr.
0,3 Mech.
2.2.2[TAB]Pressure[TAB]28 Pressure gauges (SG)
Protecting houses
28 DC-amplifier
Installation material[TAB]Dynamic behaviour
Thermal influence[TAB]161.0[TAB]0,5 Eng.Instr.
0,7 Mech.
2.2.3[TAB]Differential
pressure[TAB]~4 ▲p-cells
Protecting houses
~4 DC-amplifiers
Installation material[TAB]Dynamic behaviour
Thermal influence[TAB]30.0[TAB]0,9 Eng.Instr.
0,2 Mech.
2.2.4[TAB]Mass flow rate
and steam quality[TAB]Equipment from Semi Static measurements
shall be used.
Additional devices
(Flowmeter)[TAB]See under Semi
Static Measurements[TAB]~20.0[TAB]0,4 Eng.Instr,
0,1 Mech.
Running
No.[TAB]Measurement[TAB]Equipment[TAB]Developments
and preoptests[TAB]Hardware
Costs
(Skkr)[TAB]Manpower
manyear
2.2.5[TAB]Data acquisition
system[TAB]PCM-Equipment for 56 Channels (Analog input,
digital and analog output)[TAB]Not necessary[TAB]260.0[TAB]0,3Eng.Instr
0,2Eng.Prog.
0,1 Mech.
[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]533.0[TAB]1,7Eng.Instr.
0,2 Eng.Prog.
1,4 Mech.
3. Level Measurements
3.1 List of data channels for digital or PCM-recording
Running No.[TAB]Measurement
Position[TAB]Parameter[TAB]Number
of
Channels[TAB]Range[TAB]Measurement[TAB]Data
recording[TAB]Remarks
3.1.1[TAB]Pressure
vessel[TAB]Liquid water
level[TAB]1
2[TAB]0-3bar
0-0,5bar[TAB]Continously
"[TAB]digital[TAB]Mass determination
"
3.1.2[TAB]Drywell[TAB]Liquid water
level[TAB]1[TAB]0-0,2bar[TAB]Continously[TAB]digital[TAB]
3.1.3[TAB]Vent pipes[TAB]Liquid water
level[TAB]2 (2x7 points)[TAB][TAB]14 level
probes[TAB]PCM[TAB]
3.1.4[TAB]Vent pipe
Out let[TAB]Phase boundary
detection[TAB]3 (3x19 points)[TAB][TAB]57 level
probes[TAB]PCM[TAB]
3.1.5[TAB]Wetwell[TAB]Liquid water
level
"
"[TAB]3 (3xl0 points)
1
1[TAB]
0-0,5bar
0-0,lbar[TAB]30 level
probes
Continously
"[TAB]PCM
Digital
"[TAB]
[TAB][TAB]Visualisation
"[TAB]2
1[TAB]60 pictures/s[TAB]TV-technique
Movie-
camera[TAB]Video
film[TAB]
[TAB]Frequency range for PCM-recording: 100 Hz
3. Level Measurements
3.2 Costs for Hardware and Manpower
Running
No.[TAB]Sensor Type[TAB]Equipment[TAB]Developments and preoptests[TAB]Hardware
Costs
(Skkr)[TAB]Manpower
manyear
3.2.1[TAB]Level probes[TAB]101 Level probes
Installation material[TAB]Not necessary[TAB]84.0[TAB]0,2Eng.Instr0,3Eng.Prog.
0,6 Mech.
3.2.2[TAB]Barton cells[TAB]6 Barton cells
Installation materiel[TAB]Not necessary[TAB]31.0[TAB]0,1Eng. Instr.
0,1Mech.
3.2.3[TAB]TV-technique[TAB]Additional devices:
Lightning technique
camera scanning
water level scales
new cable
Computer time[TAB]Not necessary[TAB]18.0[TAB]0,2Eng.Instr0,2 Mech.
3.2.4[TAB]Photographic
method[TAB]Movie-camera (slow motion)
cooling system
lightning technique[TAB]Picture frequency
Lightning technique[TAB]16.0[TAB]0,2Eng.Instr0,2 Mech.
3.2.5[TAB]Data acquisition
system[TAB]Additional PCM-Equipment for 95 channels[TAB]Not necessary[TAB]240.0[TAB]0,2Eng.Instr0,3Eng.Prog.
0,1M.Prog.
[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]380.0[TAB]0,9Eng.lnstr0,6Eng.Prog.
1,2Mech.
4. Additional Measurements
4.1 List of measurements
Running
No.[TAB]Measurement[TAB]Method[TAB]Number
of
Channels[TAB]Range[TAB]Accuracy[TAB]Remarks
4.1.1[TAB]*Impact load[TAB]Load Measurements (Drag
bodies or load
cells)[TAB]10
[TAB][TAB]5%[TAB]Related to the tests No 17, 18 and 22
Measurements only during clearing time (duration about 5 s)
One line of load measurements points shall be near by one probe line
4.1.2[TAB]*Velocity in the
Blowdown channels or vent pipes[TAB]Tracer method
(Gfk-Technique
or Laser method
(Doppler anemometer)[TAB]1
1[TAB]0.01 - 300m/s[TAB][TAB]Discontinuous method
Continuous method
4.1.3[TAB]* Air content in
the blowdown
channels[TAB]Sound velocity
or sample boxes
(Gfk-technique)[TAB]1[TAB][TAB][TAB]Continuous method. This method in connection with No. 4.1.2
Discontinuous method
4.1.4[TAB]*Discharge flow
(Primarily, short term)[TAB]According to
Battelle,
Frankfurt[TAB]1[TAB][TAB][TAB]
* This is pertaining to Appendix A:1 (General)
4. Additional measurements
4.2 Costs for hardware and manpower
Running
No.[TAB]Measurement[TAB]Necessary
equipment[TAB]Developments
and preoptests[TAB]Hardware
costs
(Skkr)[TAB],
manyear[TAB]Remarks
4.2.1[TAB]Impact load[TAB]10 load cells (drag-bodies)
10 DC-amplifiers
Mechanical construction
Installation material
Other devices[TAB]Optimal sensor type
and mech. construction
dynamic behaviour[TAB]138.0[TAB]0.5 Eng. Instr
0.8 Mech[TAB]
4.2.2[TAB]Velocity in the blowdown channels[TAB]Equipment for tracer-method
Laser-Doppler-anemometer
Signal. conditioning
Installation material[TAB]Gfk-technique
Measurement and mounting technique[TAB]130.0[TAB]0.5 Eng. Instr
0.2 Mech[TAB]Development costs
for one method
4.2.3[TAB]Air content in the blowdown
channels[TAB]Sound velocity: High-temperature-microfones
Signal-conditioning
Sample-boxes
Gfk-technique[TAB]Measurement
technique
Mechanic-construction[TAB]26[TAB]0.3 Eng. Instr
0.3 Eng. Progr[TAB]
4.2.4[TAB]Discharge flow
Rate (Primarily,
short term)[TAB]Battelle equipment is
assumed[TAB]No development
work by the project[TAB]500 a)[TAB][TAB]Total costs
4.2.5[TAB]Data acquisition
system[TAB]28 additional channels
to the PCM-recorder[TAB]Not necessary[TAB]98[TAB][TAB]Total costs
a) The price is based on 3 units. It is for the time being not clear wether 1 or 3 units should be installed
APPENDIX C
ORGANIZATION
Organization Chart
[ED: Chart omitted]
PROJECT WORKING GROUPS
Project Executive Group
Exercises the immediate technical and administrative organizing functions.
Design and Operation Groups
Constitutes the technical operational group responsible for making the plant ready for the experiments, and for maintenance and reparation work on the plant equipment in connection with the experiments. The group is also responsible for the operation of the station during the experiments.
SUPPLY OF PERSONNEL, PRELIMINARY LIST
[TAB]PHASE
[TAB]Rebuilding[TAB]Experimental[TAB]Editorial
[TAB]Wage
code[TAB]Party[TAB]Manyear[TAB]Manyear[TAB]Manyear
Project management
Project manager
Technical coord.
Accounter
Secretary
Typist[TAB]03
03
05
06
06[TAB]AES
"
"
"
"[TAB]1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0[TAB]0.67
0.33
0.33
0.33
0.67[TAB]0.25
-
0.25
0.50
-
[TAB]3.5[TAB]2.33[TAB]1.0 6.8
Rebuilding and Operation
Group manager
Desing and supervision
Welders
Fitters
Mechanics
Electrican
Ops. engenier
Shift engineer
Shift mechanic
"-
"-[TAB]04
05
05
06
06
06
04
05
06
06
06[TAB]AES
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"[TAB]1.0
1.0
6.2
-
-
-
-
-[TAB]0.67
-
-
-
-
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67[TAB]-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[TAB]8.2[TAB]4.69[TAB]0 12.9
Instrumentation
Group manager
Engineer[TAB]04
04
05
05
05
05[TAB]AES
AES
Japan
AES
W Germany
AES[TAB]1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.2[TAB]0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
-
-[TAB]0.50
-
-
-
-
-
Fitter
"
"
"[TAB]06
06
06
06
06[TAB]"
"
"
"
"[TAB]1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9[TAB]0.67
0.67
0.67
-
-[TAB]-
-
-
-
-
Programmer
"
"[TAB]04
05
05[TAB]Norway
AES
France[TAB]1.0
0.6
-[TAB]0.67
0.67
0.67[TAB]0.50
-
-
[TAB]11.6[TAB]6.70[TAB]1.0 19.3
Evaluation
Group manager
Member
"
"
"[TAB]04
04
04
04
05
05
05
05[TAB]AES
USAEC
France
Finland
AES
Denmark
W Germany
Japan[TAB]1.0
-
-
0.6
0.8
0.6
-
-[TAB]0.67
0.50
0.50
0.67
-
0.67
0.50
0.50[TAB]0.50
-
-
0.50
-
-
-
-
[TAB]3.0[TAB]4.01[TAB]1.0
Experiment-instrumentation Group
Constitutes the technical operational group which is responsible for the construction of the experimental measurement equipment and for the performance of the experimental measurements.
Evaluation Group
Constitutes the group of specialists within the project responsible for the experiment preparation, data reduction and interpretation of the
results.
APPENDIX D
BUDGET
The budget for the MX-II-CRT experiment is calculated in appendices D:1 - D:9 and is given below:
TABLE 1
Skkr
[TAB]Rebuilding[TAB]Experiments[TAB]Editoring [TAB]Grand
[TAB]Wages[TAB]Mtrl[TAB]Total[TAB]Wages[TAB]Mtrl[TAB]Total[TAB]Wages[TAB]Mtrl[TAB]Total [TAB]total
Project management[TAB]631[TAB]409[TAB]1040[TAB]420[TAB]360[TAB]780[TAB]537[TAB]200[TAB]737[TAB]2557
Rebuilding & Operation[TAB]1086[TAB]1373[TAB]2459[TAB]746[TAB]40[TAB]786[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]3245
Instrumentation[TAB]1729[TAB]2389[TAB]4118[TAB]1022[TAB]270[TAB]1292[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]5410
Evaluation[TAB]517[TAB]60[TAB]577[TAB]646[TAB]250[TAB]896[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]1473
Total[TAB]3963[TAB]4231[TAB]8194[TAB]2834[TAB]920[TAB]3754[TAB]537[TAB]200[TAB]737[TAB]12685
2. The costs are calculated with the cost level of the fiscal year 1974/75 (July 1, 1974 - June 30, 1975). With starting date February 1,1975 for the project, an additional sum has to be added to the calculated budget in order to compensate for the cost rise.
Corrected wage cost= (Wage cost 74/75) x A
Corrected materials cost= (Materials cost 74/75) x B
TABLE 2
Estimated correction factors due to inflation rates during 26 months assuming a project start-up February 1, 1975.
Phase in
table 1[TAB]Correction factors
[TAB]A (Wages)[TAB]B (Material)
Rebuilding[TAB]1.12[TAB]1.0
Experiments[TAB]1.18[TAB]1.12
Editoring[TAB]1.24[TAB]1.20
With the figures in table 1 and 2 used assuming an early date for invoicing the material costs during 74/75, the starting date February 1,1975, gives the following budget:
TABLE 3
Skkr
[TAB]Rebuilding[TAB]Experiments[TAB]Editoring[TAB]Project
management
reserve[TAB]AES credit
to the
project[TAB]Grand
total
Wages
Material[TAB]4439
4231[TAB]3344
1030[TAB]666
240[TAB]
300[TAB]
-550[TAB]8449
5251
Total[TAB]8670[TAB]4374[TAB]906 1[TAB]300[TAB]-550[TAB]13700
3. A project management reserve fund amounting to 300 Skkr is included in the budget.
AES will credit the project 550 Skkr at the beginning of the editorial phase for the following peices of equipment:
- Electrical boiler, Appendix D:2, item 31
- Data acquisition system, Appendix B, item 1.2.6
- "- 2.2.5
- "- 3.2.5
- "- 4.2.5
A condition for this crediting is that the equipment is in usable condition and that it becomes the property of AES after the termination of the project without further charge. If some of the pieces of equipment are no longer operable at the termination of the project they shall be substituted by other pieces of equipment of corresponding value chosen after negotiating between the project board and AES.
4. The wage costs are calculated as follows:
Basic salary plus social costs (=35%) is multiplied with a factor 1.75 (to give home organization overhead costs coverage) plus 0.7x99 Skr/day (to give per diem costs coverage) = wage costs.
5. When crediting a party for staff costs the AB Atomenergi wage code figures and per diem figures are to be used in the formula given under 4. The wage code figures are given for each fiscal year and are now only available for the fiscal year 1974/75. The per diem figure is a result of employer/employee negotiations and are now only given for the calender year.1974. The figure used is the long time per diem cost figure which is 70Z of the short time per diem cost figure. This later figure is 99 Skr/day for the year 1974.
Table 4 below gives the total wage costs (wage costs as in 4 above) for the period July 1, 1974 - December 31, 1974.
TABLE 4
Wage costs
Code Per man hour Per man year
Skr Skkr
03 143:- 245:
04 109:- 188:
05 86:- 148:
06 73:- 126:-
This table will be revised twice a year.
6. When crediting a party for staff costs the man hour figure in table 4 above updated to the relevant period of time shall be used.
Appendix D:1
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
PREPARATION PHASE
No[TAB]Item[TAB]Man
years[TAB]Code[TAB]Wages
Skkr[TAB]Material
Skkr[TAB]Total
Skkr
1[TAB]Project manager[TAB]1,0[TAB]03[TAB]245[TAB]20[TAB]265
2[TAB]Techn Coord[TAB]0,5[TAB]03[TAB]123[TAB][TAB]123
3[TAB]Accounter[TAB]0,5[TAB]05[TAB]74[TAB][TAB]74
4[TAB]Secretary[TAB]0,5[TAB]06[TAB]63[TAB][TAB]63
5[TAB]Typist[TAB]1,0[TAB]06[TAB]126[TAB][TAB]126
6[TAB]Basic cost for the station: Heating up
And ventilation,
power for cooling pumps, power for
light and engines, water and compressed
air[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]285[TAB]285
7[TAB]Expenses:[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]
[TAB]Rents for offices[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]44[TAB]44
[TAB]Travels[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]35[TAB]35
[TAB]Telephone[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]25[TAB]25
[TAB]Total:[TAB]3,5[TAB][TAB]631[TAB]409[TAB]1040
Appendix D:2
REBUILDING AND OPERATION
PREPARATION PHASE
No[TAB]Item[TAB]Man
months[TAB]Code[TAB]Wages
Skkr[TAB]Material Skkr[TAB]Total
Skkr
[TAB]B Operations Group[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]
[TAB]Group manager[TAB]12[TAB]04[TAB]188[TAB][TAB]188
[TAB]Design & supervision[TAB]12[TAB]05[TAB]148[TAB][TAB]148
[TAB]Welders
Fitters
Mechanics
Electrician[TAB][TAB]05
06
06
06
These wages(817 kkr) and manmonths (74) are specified
below[TAB][TAB][TAB]
1,2,3[TAB]PS-lid & vessel
cupola removed[TAB]1,4[TAB][TAB]15[TAB][TAB]15
4,5[TAB]Lifting device installed, immersion
heaters removed[TAB]0,9[TAB][TAB]10[TAB][TAB]10
6[TAB]IU channels removed[TAB]1,7[TAB][TAB]18[TAB][TAB]18
7[TAB]Preparation for
cutting[TAB]0,4[TAB][TAB]5[TAB]10[TAB]l5
8[TAB]Holes cut down to bottom[TAB]1,3[TAB][TAB]16[TAB][TAB]16
9[TAB]Remaining channels
removed[TAB]10[TAB][TAB]105[TAB][TAB]105
10[TAB]Vessel internal cut & removed[TAB]8[TAB][TAB]86[TAB][TAB]86
11[TAB]Heating pipes mounted[TAB]3,8[TAB][TAB]47[TAB]50[TAB]97
12[TAB]Heat exch 385E2 connected[TAB]0,9[TAB][TAB]12[TAB]25[TAB]37
13[TAB]Remaining blind
flanges made[TAB]3,4[TAB][TAB]39[TAB]20[TAB]59
No[TAB]Item[TAB]Man
months[TAB]Code[TAB]Wages
Skkr[TAB]Material
Skkr[TAB]Total
Skkr
14[TAB]Break device 311 rebuilt[TAB]3,4[TAB][TAB]39[TAB]50[TAB]89
15,16[TAB]Rearrangement of ventilation[TAB]2[TAB][TAB]21[TAB][TAB]21
17[TAB]Reactor openings
sealed, air pressure
test 6 bar[TAB]1,4[TAB][TAB]16[TAB][TAB]16
18[TAB]Cold water pressure test[TAB]1,4[TAB][TAB]16[TAB][TAB]16
19[TAB]PS-lid mounted[TAB]1[TAB][TAB]12[TAB][TAB]12
20[TAB]Air pressure test of PS[TAB]2[TAB][TAB]24[TAB][TAB]24
21[TAB]Electrical boiler
installed[TAB]1[TAB][TAB]13[TAB]10[TAB]23
22[TAB]2 cold air blowdowns[TAB]1,4[TAB][TAB]16[TAB][TAB]16
23[TAB]Prep for hot trial
runs[TAB]2,7[TAB][TAB]30[TAB][TAB]30
24[TAB]Hot trial runs[TAB]1,9[TAB][TAB]22[TAB][TAB]22
25[TAB]Prefab & install of mtrl for partly
blocking header[TAB]1,9[TAB][TAB]10(22x) )[TAB]8[TAB](30)18
26[TAB]Prefab & install of
mtrl for volume restriction in pool[TAB]11[TAB][TAB]65(113xx) )[TAB]90[TAB](203)155
27[TAB]Steel vent pipes
installed[TAB]0,6[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]
28[TAB]Area restrictions
betw rooms[TAB]1,9[TAB][TAB]22[TAB]12[TAB]34
29[TAB]Device for prepurging installed[TAB]0,6[TAB][TAB]7[TAB]6[TAB]13
30[TAB]Rebuilding of
control room[TAB]8[TAB][TAB]84[TAB]17[TAB]101
31[TAB]Electrical boiler[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]850[TAB]850
32[TAB]Power supply[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]225[TAB]225
[TAB]Total:[TAB]98[TAB][TAB]1086[TAB]1373[TAB]2459
x)10 during preparation phase, 12 during experiments
xx) 65 "-, 48 "-
Appendix D:3
INSTRUMENTATION
PREPARATION PHASE
No[TAB]Item[TAB]Man
years[TAB]Code[TAB]Wages
Skkr[TAB]Material
Skkr[TAB]Total
Skkr
[TAB]Instrumentation Group
1[TAB]Group manager[TAB]1[TAB]04[TAB]188[TAB][TAB]188
2[TAB]Engineer[TAB]1[TAB]04[TAB]188[TAB][TAB]188
3[TAB]"-[TAB]1[TAB]05[TAB]148[TAB][TAB]148
4[TAB]"-[TAB]1[TAB]05[TAB]148[TAB][TAB]148
5[TAB]Fitter[TAB]1[TAB]06[TAB]126[TAB][TAB]126
6[TAB]"-[TAB]1[TAB]06[TAB]126[TAB][TAB]126
7[TAB]"-[TAB]1[TAB]06[TAB]126[TAB][TAB]126
8[TAB]"-[TAB]1[TAB]06[TAB]126[TAB][TAB]126
9[TAB]Engineer[TAB]0,2[TAB]05[TAB]30[TAB][TAB]30
IO[TAB]"-[TAB]0,9[TAB]05[TAB]133[TAB][TAB]133
11[TAB]Fitter[TAB]0,9[TAB]06[TAB]113[TAB][TAB]113
12[TAB]Programmer[TAB]1[TAB]04[TAB]188[TAB][TAB]188
13[TAB]"-[TAB]0,6[TAB]05[TAB]89[TAB][TAB]89
[TAB]Hardware
[TAB]Equipment purchased
from the MX-I project
Equipment specified
in appendix B[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]250
2139[TAB]250
2139
[TAB]Total:[TAB]11,6[TAB][TAB]1729[TAB]2389[TAB]4118
Appendix D:4
EVALUATION GROUP
PREPARATION PHASE
No[TAB]Item[TAB]Man
years[TAB]Code[TAB]Wages
Skkr[TAB]Material
Skkr[TAB]Total
Skkr
1[TAB]Group manager[TAB]1,0[TAB]04[TAB]188[TAB][TAB]188
2[TAB]Engineer[TAB]0,4[TAB]04[TAB]75[TAB][TAB]75
3[TAB]"-[TAB]0,2[TAB]04[TAB]38[TAB][TAB]38
4[TAB]"-[TAB]0,2[TAB]04[TAB]38[TAB][TAB]38
5[TAB]"-[TAB]0,4[TAB]05[TAB]59[TAB][TAB]59
6[TAB]"-[TAB]0,4[TAB]05[TAB]59[TAB][TAB]59
7[TAB]"-[TAB]0,2[TAB]05[TAB]30[TAB][TAB]30
8[TAB]"-[TAB]0,2[TAB]05[TAB]30[TAB][TAB]30
9[TAB]Computer time[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]50[TAB]50
10[TAB]Other materials[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]10[TAB]10
[TAB]Total:[TAB]3,0[TAB][TAB]517[TAB]60[TAB]577
Appendix D:5
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
EXPERIMENTAL PHASE
No[TAB]Item[TAB]Man
years[TAB]Code [TAB]Wages
Skkr[TAB]Material
Skkr[TAB]Total
Skkr
1[TAB]Project manager[TAB]2/3[TAB]03[TAB]163[TAB][TAB]163
2[TAB]Techn coordinator[TAB]1/3[TAB]03[TAB]82[TAB][TAB]82
3[TAB]Accountant[TAB]1/3[TAB]05[TAB]49[TAB][TAB]49
4[TAB]Secretary[TAB]1/3[TAB]06[TAB]42[TAB][TAB]42
5[TAB]Typist[TAB]2/3[TAB]06[TAB]84[TAB][TAB]84
6[TAB]Basic costs for the Station:[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]
[TAB]Heating up and ventilation[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]
[TAB]Power for cooling
pumps[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]
[TAB]Power for light and
small motors[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]240[TAB]240
7[TAB]Expenses:[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]
[TAB]Power[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]
[TAB]Rent for offices[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]
[TAB]Travels[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]
[TAB]Telephone[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]120[TAB]120
[TAB]Total:[TAB]2 1/3[TAB][TAB]420[TAB]360[TAB]780
Appendix D:6
OPERATION GROUP
EXPERIMENTAL PHASE
No[TAB]Item[TAB]Man
years[TAB]Code[TAB]Wages
Skkr[TAB]Material
Skkr[TAB]Total
Skkr
1[TAB]Group manager[TAB]2/3[TAB]04[TAB]126[TAB]40[TAB]166
2[TAB]Ops. engineer[TAB]2/3[TAB]04[TAB]125[TAB][TAB]125
3[TAB]Shift engineer[TAB]2/3[TAB]05[TAB]99[TAB][TAB]99
4[TAB]Shift mechanic[TAB]2/3[TAB]06[TAB]84[TAB][TAB]84
5[TAB]"-[TAB]2/3[TAB]06[TAB]84[TAB][TAB]84
6[TAB]"-[TAB]2/3[TAB]06[TAB]84[TAB][TAB]84
7[TAB]Electrician[TAB]2/3[TAB]06[TAB]84[TAB][TAB]84
[TAB]Total:[TAB]4 2/3[TAB][TAB]686[TAB]40[TAB]726
Appendix D:7
INSTRUMENTATION
EXPERIMENTAL PHASE
No[TAB]Item[TAB]Man
years[TAB]Code[TAB]Wages
Skkr[TAB]Material
Skkr[TAB]Total
Skkr
[TAB]Instrumentation Group[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]
[TAB]
Group manager[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]
1[TAB][TAB]2/3[TAB]04[TAB]126[TAB]20[TAB]146
2[TAB]Engineer[TAB]2/3[TAB]04[TAB]125[TAB][TAB]125
3[TAB]"-[TAB]2/3[TAB]05[TAB]98[TAB][TAB]98
4[TAB]"-[TAB]2/3[TAB]05[TAB]99[TAB][TAB]99
5[TAB]Fitter[TAB]2/3[TAB]06[TAB]84[TAB][TAB]84
6[TAB]"-[TAB]2/3[TAB]06[TAB]84[TAB][TAB]84
7[TAB]"-[TAB]2/3[TAB]06[TAB]84[TAB][TAB]84
8[TAB]Programmer[TAB]2/3[TAB]04[TAB]126[TAB]250x)[TAB]376
9[TAB]"-[TAB]2/3[TAB]05[TAB]98[TAB][TAB]98
10[TAB]"-[TAB]2/3[TAB]05[TAB]98[TAB][TAB]98
[TAB]Total:[TAB]6 2/3[TAB][TAB]1022[TAB]270[TAB]1292
x) Computer costs
Appendix D:8
EVALUATION CROUP
EXPERIMENTAL PHASE
No[TAB]Item[TAB]Man
years[TAB]Code[TAB]Wages
Skkr[TAB]Material
Skkr[TAB]Total
Skkr
1[TAB]Group leader[TAB]2/3[TAB]04[TAB]126[TAB][TAB]126
2[TAB]Member[TAB]2/3[TAB]04[TAB]126[TAB][TAB]126
3[TAB]"-[TAB]2/3[TAB]05[TAB]99[TAB][TAB]99
4[TAB]"-[TAB]2/3[TAB]05[TAB]99[TAB][TAB]99
5[TAB]"-[TAB]2/3[TAB]05[TAB]98[TAB][TAB]98
6[TAB]"-[TAB]2/3[TAB]05[TAB]98[TAB][TAB]98
7[TAB]Computer time[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]180[TAB]180
8[TAB]Other materials[TAB][TAB][TAB][TAB]70[TAB]70
[TAB]Total:[TAB]4.0[TAB][TAB]646[TAB]250[TAB]896
Appendix D:9
EDITORIAL PHASE
No[TAB]Item[TAB]Man
years[TAB]Code[TAB]Wages
Skkr[TAB]Material
Skkr[TAB]Total
Skkr
1[TAB]Project manager[TAB]0,25[TAB]03[TAB]61[TAB]200[TAB]261
2[TAB]Secretary[TAB]0,5[TAB]06[TAB]63[TAB][TAB]63
3[TAB]Accountant[TAB]0,25[TAB]05[TAB]37[TAB][TAB]37
4[TAB]Instrument group[TAB]0,5[TAB]04[TAB]94[TAB][TAB]94
5[TAB]Data collecting group[TAB]0,5[TAB]04[TAB]94[TAB][TAB]94
6[TAB]Evaluation group[TAB]1,0[TAB]04[TAB]188[TAB][TAB]188
[TAB]Total:[TAB]3,0[TAB][TAB]537[TAB]200[TAB]737
APPENDIX E
TIME SCHEDULE
Appendix E
p. 2
OVERALL TIME SCHEDULE FOR MX-II-CRT
[ED: Image omitted]
APPENDIX F
REPORTS
The principles of reporting arc given below. It is the responsibilities of the project Board to decide on further details.
Current reporting
The project shall, during the preoperational and experimental phase, undertake a current documentation of the technical and economic development of the project.
Technical reporting
The purpose of the current technical reporting during the first two phases of the project is to
-Convey information to the Project Board and to the Technical Advisory Committee,
-Keep the project personnel informed, and
-Prepare for the final reporting to be carried out during the third phase, the so-called editorial phase.
These reports shall give the progress and status of the project programme with respect to rebuilding, operational experiences, setting-up of instrumentation and data acquisition systems including calibrations, testing and data reduction procedures. These reports will be produced as appropriate according to the proceeding of the work.
Quarterly technical reports shall be prepared (two pages) and submitted two weeks after the end of each calendar quarter. These reports shall contain information on completed work as compared with planned work during the period in question and give views on further development.
During the experimental phase interim Test Result Reports, one for each test, shall be prepared, presenting data in the form of data lists and diagram plots. These reports shall also contain a chronological presentation of the main test events.
Since it is not possible to present all the data recorded, the project will have to make a selection in their presentation in the Test Result Reports of test data considering available funds and the time schedule of the project.
The project shall without request distribute to each Project Board member and TAC-member a copy of each Test Result Report. In addition, a cumulative list giving the titles of the project
reports shall be distributed once a month. The reports not distributed automatically may be requested.
Compilation of data for the Test Result Reports can be started earliest four weeks after the performance of the actual test.
Administrative reporting
The project shall supply information to the Project Board and the Technical Advisory Committee on administrative matters in special reports.
The administrative reports shall give information on actual costs and estimates of future cost compared to the approved budget, the project staff situation and the status of the project as related to the time-schedule.
These reports shall without request be distributed quarterly to each Project Board member and TAC-member as soon as possible after the end of each quarter.
The economical status of the project shall, however, be reported monthly.
Final reporting
The final reports shall deal with technical matters only and shall, on the basis of previously prepared reports, be completed during the editorial phase and be subject to approval by the Project Board.
The final project documentation shall contain a description of the test facility, the instrumentation and data acquisition systems, the results of the calibrations, a description of the data reduction procedure, evaluated accuracy of the data channels, test data and qualitative interpretations of the results.
Each contracting party shall, free of charge, receive one set of the final reports.
The basic material generated and collected within the frame of the project will be available to the parties. This material consisting of magnetic data tapes, films and photographs etc shall upon request be duplicated and delivered to the parties. The costs shall be borne by the ordering party.
DEFINITION OF TERMS
In order to ensure unanimous understanding of the Agreement the meaning of some of the terms used in the text have been defined as follows:
Experiment - preparation:
Parameter evaluation and determination of test conditions for subsequent experiment.
Data:
Assigned value of the signal recorded by one of the data acquisition systems and the associated result obtained through the conversion into physical units.
Data reduction:
Processing of recorded signals so as to give access to data on magnetic tapes, on diagrams and in data tables, expressed in physical units
Interpretation of results:
Explanation of or giving the meaning of data and of results deduced from the data or from specific combinations of data, expressed either in words or in figures or if the form of diagrams or tables.
Remark:
The data reduction, giving physical meaning of recorded signa, utilizing calibration results, is a specific kind of interpretation which is not referred to here.
